Seo Strategy: News
Seo Strategy: Thematic Articles
Seo Strategy: Articles A-Z
Our Partners
SiteMap
all news News
  • Nebuad aims to mollify privacy critics with senate testimony
  • Yahoo: phoenix or zombie?
  • Answers.com takes new, old approach to search
  • Viewzi offers new look at visual search
  • A new trend for google
all articles Articles
  • Optimize your website...and they will come
  • Top 20 contributing factors for google seo
  • How to build backlinks via google alerts
  • How to build an impressive social networking presence, beginning with facebook
  • Web designs deadliest 4 mistakes

Advertisers welcome possible yahoo sale, but fear cpm hikes


Much insurance coverage of Microsoft's $44.1 billion bid for Yahoo has focused on the hunt implications, but the coupling affects show advertising as well. In terms of raw feeling, a combined Microsoft/Yahoo would traffic 59 percent of all U.S.-based display ads, according to Nielsen.

That stock list would come from many pail, including portals MSN and Yahoo, ad web BlueLithium, Right Media's exchange, aQuantive's DrivePM web, AdECN and both parties' expanding web relationships with the likes of Viacom, Facebook, Digg, and WSJ Digital. (Yahoo owns BlueLithium and Right Media; Microsoft owns aQuantive and AdECN.)

For media buyers that's largely a good thing, gift them more reach for their targeted buys than antecedently available in one place. But federal agency execs also fear the ghost of price hikes, as ever more U.S. Web ad stock list is concentrated with just one marketer.

Jeff E. G. Marshall, SVP Digital Managing manager at Starcom IP, is among the concerned. "You ever have to inquiry when supply gets consolidated, is control shifting to that side?" E. G. Marshall said. "Then, are they going to wield that control to manipulate pricing?"

But E. G. Marshall said the potentiality deal's top -- good targeting based on behavioral and enrollment data -- outweighs the dangers for now.

"We're still in such an early stage of digital marketing that this consolidation only helps us in being able to add efficiency to operations," he said. "When you can congeries that [data] across those two major media companies, that becomes really interesting."

Agency.com San Francisco media manager Allen Stern is likewise conflicted. "I'm disappointed from a media purchasing perspective, because I like to play them off each other," he said. "Our concern is CPMs increasing. That's the big negative to this whole thing."

"But would that have happened in two years anyhow?" he continued. "We decidedly don't want to see Yahoo go away. It seems like a marriage that has to be."

While Microsoft has clearly put huge emphasis on building its ad-related offerings over the past two years, there appears to be a consensus that the company isn't as polished as Yahoo when it comes to serving the needs of advertisers. Execs were optimistic on Friday that Yahoo's savvy might rub off on its would-be parent.

Additionally, Microsoft has moved slower than Yahoo in integrating its ad network purchases, and has even lagged on industry standard practices like frequency capping.

"We should've seen more integration by now," Agency.com's Stern said, referring to Microsoft's aQuantive buy. "With BlueLithium and Right Media we saw pretty instant integration on the Yahoo side."

Starcom IP's Marshall is slightly more forgiving.

"Yahoo just has a head start," Marshall said. "I've been really encouraged over the past couple years in how Microsoft has been able to catch up. Yahoo is a little ahead in terms of understanding the language of advertising. The fact that Microsoft [is doing this] shows they understand that advertising is becoming a much bigger part of their business."